CONCLUSION
The purpose of this study is
to identify the conversational maxims which are appeared and what types of maxims which are
flouted in the casual conversation. Based
on the
analysis above, It can be seen the results as
follows.
1. The first result shows that the frequency
maxim of quantity is the highest among the other maxims in the casual
conversation. The maxims of quantity appeared 16 times, followed by maxim of
quality with 13 times appeared, 2 times appeared for the maxim of relation and
only 1 time for maxim of manner.
2. The second result shows that there were 3
kinds flouting maxims in the conversation. The flouting maxims that the
speakers did were maxim of quantity (only 1 time) and maxim of quality (2
times).
According to the
result, the writer concluded that both of the students obey the
conversational maxims. it
means that the speakers obey the rule of Gricean maxims. It also means that the
conversation runs smoothly and both of the speakers understand what they
uttered in the conversation. Although there is some flouting inside the
conversation, but
it does not mean that there is some problems occur in the conversation. The writer also concluded that both of the students
understand well about the role of their selves in the conversation. So, the
casual conversation runs well without any pressure or intimidation.
REFERENCES
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic
and Conversation. In: P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
Kumar, R. (1996). Research
Methodology. California: Sage Publication.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principle
of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Woods, P. (1999). Successful
Writing for Qualitative Researchers. New York: Routledge.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar